• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Prosperous Places

A Practical Guide to Successful Community & Economic Development

  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Partners
    • Affiliates
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Visit Janus Institute
    • Visit Rock Paper Scissors

A Chicken vs. Egg Redux

You are here: Home / Community Development / A Chicken vs. Egg Redux

Community Development, Economic Development · February 22, 2019

The locational links between employees and employers have changed in the last few decades in many sectors and areas of the U.S. and other industrialized countries. In today’s knowledge economy this which comes first “chicken or egg” question has major implications for community and economic development. Communities and economic developers who understand and act on these changes will enjoy a significant competitive advantage.

Retro Suburban Area

More than a century ago the industrial age began the transformation of America from an agricultural to a production economy. The location of many industries was dictated by transportation and natural resources, helping create some of today’s largest cities such as Chicago (steel) and Detroit (automobiles).  Millions of Americans migrated from the farm to industrial jobs in urban areas. In post-war America transportation and communication improvements made industries and workers more foot-loose. Some companies moved away from cities to lower cost locations, helping to industrialize the South. Suburban areas flourished as many employees could now commute longer distances, but they were still tied to the physical location of their employers.

Today the rise of the knowledge economy is once again changing the employee-employer location relationship in many industries. Business success is increasingly driven by technology and innovation, and highly skilled and educated (often younger) employees are in high demand. This new reality is influencing companies to locate or relocate where knowledge workers prefer to live, not the reverse that has historically been the rule. A prime example of this new dynamic is General Electric’s recent relocation of its headquarters from suburban Connecticut to the City of Boston, a move widely attributed to GE’s desire to increase access to a younger, more educated workforce. The Chairman and CEO of GE at the time, Jeff Immelt, said this about the move:

“…in Boston, you just walk out the door…. and you are where the ideas are….when I looked out my window in Connecticut, it was beautiful, but I saw nothing going on.”

In a strong economy, labor availability is increasingly an overriding factor in business location decisions, as noted by Deloitte Consulting site consultants:

“…the war for talent is about to become much more pronounced and painful. Demographic shifts in the United States will soon alter corporate location and growth strategies, as well as the very objectives of economic development.”

The practice of economic development is changing in a very significant way, and it must to remain relevant in today’s service economy. In 1980, 26.4 percent of workers were employed in goods-producing industries and 55.3 percent were employed in service-producing industries. In 2018, manufacturing’s share had fallen by almost half to 13.9 percent and the service sector’s share had jumped to 71.1 percent³. For years the formula for economic development success was to offer a community that was development-ready in terms of infrastructure (transportation, utilities, etc.), available sites and buildings, and a labor force suitable for goods-producing or lighter service industries such as call centers, and then recruit, recruit, recruit. “Soft” quality of life factors such as recreational and cultural opportunities, retail, restaurants, etc. were viewed as secondary considerations or tie-breakers.

As business success becomes increasingly tied to attracting and retaining highly skilled and educated workers, the definition of a development-ready, competitive community is becoming much more comprehensive. Younger knowledge workers (often referred to collectively as “millennials”) generally prefer to live in areas with a high quality of life, and as discussed above, many firms such as General Electric (a goods- and service-producing company) value proximity to these knowledge workers.

Place-making: Placing more emphasis on community development, which facilitates economic development.For economic developers, elected officials and community leaders who want to strengthen the local economy and create better opportunities for local residents, the job has become more complicated. Economic development now revolves around place-making. More emphasis needs to be placed on community development which now more than ever facilitates economic development, which in turn generates local taxes and other benefits that lead to more community development.

This shift was readily evident in a recent survey of our alumni network – community and economic professionals, local leaders, site consultants and corporate executives who have attended the Janus Forum over the past ten years. The survey asked a series of questions about the most pressing trends issues facing the economic development profession and professional. Labor availability and workforce development were most commonly cited, and the changing relationship between community and economic development was clearly evident in the survey. Some examples of responses along these lines:

“We are in a time of transition where the past will not be a good model for the future.”

“We must get leadership to understand that if we don’t address the talent issue, our ability to attract and retain businesses will be compromised.”

“The talent wars are upon us.”

“Many of us are struggling with our priorities. Attracting new companies is always the “sexy” headline, but is that necessarily the role of the economic developer anymore? Should states and communities focus on enhanced workforce development programs, quality of life improvements, etc.”

As noted in these quotes from the survey, development professionals face the additional challenge of educating community leaders on the changing nature of community and economic development.

Let's Discuss... Banner

We want to hear your views on the issues raised in this essay – help us and our readers get more information and a broader perspective on the significant changes underway in community and economic development.

  1. Do you agree or disagree with the trends and issues outlines in this essay? What would you like to add to the discussion?
  2. Are you experiencing these trends in your community or service area? How so?
  3. How are you and your community or service area addressing these issues of workforce development, talent recruitment, and the need for more comprehensive community development efforts?
  4. Other comments?

We look forward to your input. Have some thoughts to the questions and content above? Feel free to post them in the comments below.

In addition to posting your comments, feel free to respond to other postings. Just like the Janus Forum, this blog is a learning-by-sharing exercise.

Sources:

Source #1 – Recently GE announced that it would not build a new office tower in Boston, but will instead house its headquarters staff in existing buildings.
Source #2
Source #3

60

SHARES
facebook Share on Facebook
Twitter Tweet
Follow Follow us
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share

Filed Under: Community Development, Economic Development Tagged With: community development, knowledge economy, millennial, workforce development

Next Post: How’m I Doin? Taking Stock of Your Community »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Tucson Roberts says

    February 22, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    I’ve noticed an evolution toward more emphasis on workforce training and community livability. Every prospect agreement now seems to include coordinated workforce skill training with a high school in coordination with a local community college. I’ve also observed that state initial job training is playing a larger and essential role. There is also a well-researched trend toward industries moving toward downtown rather toward the suburbs. ‘‘This is an attempt to attract a millennial workforce by appealing to their preference for a walk-around environment and livable city. Times are -a-changing and so are our Economic Development practices.

    Reply
  2. Tim Martin says

    February 22, 2019 at 4:36 pm

    Life is accelerating at an accelerating pace. If we aren’t open to change we will be left behind. I like the Ray Norda quote: “Cause change and lead, accept change and survive, resist change and die.” And how about the General Eric Shinseki thought: “If you don’t like change, you’re going to like irrelevance even less.” Martin Luther King, Jr. said this: “Today our very survival depends on our ability to stay awake, adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant, and to face the challenge of change.”
    But these attitudes are too often uncommon attitudes. As community and economic developers we must model this attitude and their accompanying behaviors.

    Reply
    • Robert Pittman, Prosperous Places says

      February 25, 2019 at 2:29 pm

      More and more economic development job titles are things like “talent development director” and “director of workforce development.” Having these experts in the front line of business recruiting and retention/expansion provides a competitive advantage. As the blog discusses, the current pace of change in the field of community and economic development is most significant if not unprecedented. Strategic planning and thinking for communities and community and economic developers is critical now.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 5 Steps for Inviting Guest Speakers to Your Community
  • Community Action Groups Best Practices
  • Remote Work Communities: A New Economic Development Opportunity
  • Economic Development in the New Normal
  • Tourism After COVID-19: Attracting Guests in a New Reality

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Janus Institute

Visit the Janus Institute

Rock Paper Scissors Logo

Visit Rock Paper Scissors

Latest Blogs

Tourism After COVID-19

Tourism After COVID-19: Attracting Guests in a New Reality

Summary Introduction Robert Pittman, Founder and Executive Director of the Janus Institute Tourism is a very important industry for many communities (sometimes the largest) but often it is not recognized as such because the impact is spread over different industries: retail, restaurant, lodging and related industries.  The COVID-19 crisis poses a special challenge for tourism…

COVID-19 and the Economic Development Community

The COVID-19 Crisis: How Can the Economic Development Community Respond?

Summary Sponsors and Moderators Robert Pittman, Founder and Executive Director, Janus Institute Amanda Sutt, Creative Director and CEO, Rock Paper Scissors Panelists Ron Starner, Executive Vice President, Conway, Inc. and Publisher of Site Selection magazine  Rope Roberts, Community Development Manager, Georgia Power Invited panelist Wiley Blankenship, President/CEO of Coastal Alabama Partnership was called into meetings…

Resolving Political Division Feature Image

Resolving Political Division Begins with Community

By Robert H. Pittman, Executive Director and Founder, Janus Institute For those who still may not understand that our country faces significant and perhaps unprecedented political divisions, a quick scan of the news will educate them quickly. It is often hard to tell if you are reading a news article or an editorial when so…

Footer

Contact Us

Stay in Touch With Us

Site Map

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Connect with Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Partners

Sign Up for Updates

Copyright © 2022 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in